Side by side

Cortea vs AUDITSU

Compare what each tool does, what it costs, and how it fits your workflow.

Designed for
AI agents that catch audit errors before they matter.
Accessibility compliance for EU mobile apps
Primary task
Technical audits
Mobile accessibility
Pricing
Unknown
Free Trial · Trial; then from $266/mo
Pricing details
Not documented — check the provider
Free + from $266/mo
Billing cycle
Not documented
Monthly
API access
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web
Web
Integrations
Not documented
MCP
Source rating
No rating recorded
4.5 / 5 · 6 ratings
Catalog views
95
16k
Estimated monthly traffic
—
—
Catalog imported
29 Aug 2026
29 Aug 2026
Listed strengths
  • Improves audit quality
  • Comprehensive audit file review
  • Detects inconsistencies quickly
  • Constructed around auditing standards
  • Enhances existing systems/methodologies
  • Unlimited same domain users
  • Role-based access control
  • Covers EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA in one audit
  • Built for non-technical teams, no code access needed
  • Audits, tickets, and legal statements in one platform
Listed limitations
  • No offline mode
  • No multi-language support
  • Lacks custom review methodologies
  • Dependent on existing methodologies
  • No inbuilt audit methodologies
  • Guided audit, not an automated scan
  • Too structured for solo devs
  • No CI/CD or continuous monitoring yet
  • No Figma or design-tool integrations
  • Statement templates lean EU-first

← Cortea AUDITSU →