Mobile accessibility vv2026.05.05 2026 Rank: #1701
AUDITSU ✓
Accessibility compliance for EU mobile apps
Verdict
A quick read before you dig into the full page.
- Best if
- Accessibility compliance for EU mobile apps
- Skip if
- Guided audit, not an automated scan
- Pick this when
- Unlimited same domain users
Considering geni by MemoryLane instead? Compare side by side
Overview
AUDITSU is one place to do all three.
Register your app and define the screens that need auditing. Run a guided audit against WCAG 2.1 AA and EN 301 549, with plain-language guidance on every check so your team doesn't need prior accessibility expertise. Where a check fails, a ticket is created and assigned to the owner of that screen. When the ticket closes, the audit result updates automatically. When you're ready to declare, the platform generates a legally compliant accessibility statement directly from your live audit data, so what you publish always matches what you've fixed.
The same WCAG 2.1 AA standard is what US courts measure apps against in ADA Title III cases, and it's what the DOJ's Title II rule now requires of public-sector digital services. One audit cycle covers both jurisdictions.
Backed by the Royal Academy of Engineering, the UK Government and PXN Ventures.
Built for the people who carry the risk. Compliance, product, legal, and operations teams at mid-market companies that can't justify £50k external audits but are now liable. No code access needed. No accessibility background needed.
Our BETA plan is now live with a lifetime price lock.
- Accessibility Testing
- Accessibility Statment
- App Auditing
- Ada Compliance
- Eaa Compliance
Best for
Short scenarios where AUDITSU tends to shine.
-
Accessibility compliance for EU mobile apps
Example outputs 1
Sample generations and before/after results for AUDITSU.
Access & connections
Where you can use AUDITSU, and what it plugs into.
Platforms
Integrations
Capabilities
What this tool accepts, produces, and is strongest at.
Highlights
- MCP
- Hard Paywall
- Use code TAAFT
- 10% OFF
Supported features
- MCP
Pros & cons
Pros
- Unlimited same domain users
- Role-based access control
- Covers EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA in one audit
- Built for non-technical teams, no code access needed
- Audits, tickets, and legal statements in one platform
- Replaces £15k–£50k consultancy audits
- Self-serve pricing, no sales call needed
- Demo available
Cons
- Guided audit, not an automated scan
- Too structured for solo devs
- No CI/CD or continuous monitoring yet
- No Figma or design-tool integrations
- Statement templates lean EU-first
Compare alternatives
Similar tools in the catalog — with a clear reason to open each one.
geni by MemoryLane ✓
FreemiumGeni Make your aging parents' smartphones accessible and fun touse
Why look Typically cheaper
Full comparisonWhacka ✓
Free TrialTurn ideas into real apps from your phone.
Why look Typically cheaper
Full comparisonBase44 Superagents ✓
FreemiumBuild your own AI agent in minutes, not days.
Why look Typically cheaper
Full comparisonNautex AI ✓
FreemiumSpecifications management for Coding Agents
Why look Typically cheaper
Full comparison
OpenToon ✓
Free TrialRead every manhwa in your language.
Why look Typically cheaper
Full comparisonPeople also view
Tools that often show up alongside AUDITSU in collections and comparisons.
Releases 3
Major release. Complete rebuild of the platform.
Audit your mobile app screen by screen against EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA. Each finding becomes a ticket your team can assign, prioritise, and close out, with remediation history kept on the audit trail.
Generate accessibility statements that satisfy EU (EAA), UK (Equality Act), and US (ADA Title III) requirements, mapped to EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA.
Refreshed onboarding, billing, and subscription management throughout.
Opened access to the AUDITSU pilot programme
Now accepting applications from organisations interested in early access
Pilot participation is limited and subject to manual review
Imported reviews 3
Accuracy – Does it give correct and trustworthy answers?
Usefulness – Does it actually help you complete tasks?
Ease of use – Is it simple and user-friendly?
Speed & reliability – Does it respond quickly without errors?
Value – Is it worth using compared to other AIs?
👉 A simple way to rate it:
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Excellent (very helpful, accurate)
⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Good (mostly reliable)
⭐⭐⭐ = Average (sometimes helpful)
⭐⭐ = Poor (often inaccurate)
⭐ = Bad (not useful)
This is exactly what we have been looking for. Can't wait to run it
This looks great. Love the branding!
FAQ 3
Does this work for websites?
🛠️ 1
tool
🙏 375
karma
wrote:
No, AUDITSU is for mobile apps only.
Do I need to involve developers?
🛠️ 1
tool
wrote:
No setup, no code, no dev time. The platform is designed so anybody can follow the instructions to audit your app.
Does this work for US accessibility laws?
🛠️ 1
tool
wrote:
Yes, the ADA is measured against WCAG 2.1 AA in US courts and our audit includes that coverage as well as EN 301 549 which adds further requirements in addition.