Side by side
Archivist vs Glean
Compare what each tool does, what it costs, and how it fits your workflow.
Designed for
Blazingly fast AI semantic search for your codebase.
Work AI connected to your company's tools, data, and context
Primary task
Code search
Personal assistant
Pricing
Free
Unknown
Pricing details
Free
Not documented — check the provider
Billing cycle
Not documented
Not documented
API access
Not documented
Listed as available
Platforms
Web
Web
Integrations
Not documented
Google Drive, Salesforce, GitHub, Slack, Jira, MCP
Source rating
No rating recorded
5.0 / 5 · 3 ratings
Catalog views
539
8.8k
Estimated monthly traffic
—
—
Catalog imported
30 Aug 2026
31 Aug 2026
Listed strengths
- Semantic search feature
- Quick codebase search
- Summarizes code snippets
- Automatically updates index
- Swift query delivery
- Connects to 100+ enterprise tools and data sources
- Permission-aware answers, only shows what each user can already access
- Every answer traces back to its source document
- Supports 40+ LLMs including GPT, Gemini, Claude, and Glean's own Waldo
- No-code agent builder for automating workflows
Listed limitations
- Limited language support
- Requires initial indexing
- Requires VS Code
- Requires .archivist directory
- Mandatory config.json setup
- Built for enterprise, not suited for individuals or small teams
- Requires significant setup and connector configuration to unlock full value
- Pricing is not transparent or published
- No free tier or self-serve signup, demo required to get started
- Heavy focus on large organizations means smaller companies may find it overkill