Paper
VerNav: Verifier-First Low-Latency Vision-and-Language Navigation
Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to navigate through unseen 3D environments according to natural-language instructions. Explicit reasoning can improve instruction understanding and semantic grounding, but autoregressive generation at every step accumulates large decision-stage latency over multi-step navigation. We propose VerNav, a verifier-first framework for low-latency LLM-based VLN. The ver · Authors: Zhixin Wang, Chengzheyi Yao, Leyuan Liu, Xiaosong Zhang, Yongzhao Zhang · Published 2026-09-01 · arXiv:2609.00920
- Published
- 2026-09-01
- Authors
- 5
- arXiv
- 2609.00920
- Category
- cs.RO
Abstract
arXiv:2609.00920
Zhixin Wang, Chengzheyi Yao, Leyuan Liu, Xiaosong Zhang, Yongzhao Zhang
Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to navigate through unseen 3D environments according to natural-language instructions. Explicit reasoning can improve instruction understanding and semantic grounding, but autoregressive generation at every step accumulates large decision-stage latency over multi-step navigation. We propose VerNav, a verifier-first framework for low-latency LLM-based VLN. The verifier reduces decision-stage latency by replacing per-step autoregressive generation with batched action verification, while an entropy-based adaptive generator is invoked only for uncertain decisions to produce compact state evidence. To further improve navigation performance with the verifier, we introduce a two-stage alignment scheme: (i) VPO improves local action-preference alignment in static verifier training, and (ii) step-level reinforcement fine-tuning provides dense progress rewards over multi-step navigation rollouts during dynamic task execution. Experiments on the Room-to-Room (R2R) benchmark show that the verifier-only decision path of VerNav achieves competitive navigation performance among representative LLM-based VLN agents while reducing average decision-stage LLM latency per step by more than $10\times$ compared with autoregressive methods.