Paper

Drift Calibration in Geometric Eye Tracking Systems

Geometric eye trackers can provide the spatial accuracy required for gaze-based interaction and multimodal studies, but their measurements remain sensitive to residual session-specific calibration error. Research on correcting this error is difficult to compare because methods are typically evaluated with different devices, target layouts, and error definitions. We present a calibration-focused dataset containing 163 · Authors: Jiaqi Liu, Zixuan Wang, Yuhong Zhang, Dingkang Liang, Jane Hanqi Li, Tzyy-Ping Jung… · Published 2026-08-30 · arXiv:2608.29739

Published
2026-08-30
Authors
7
arXiv
2608.29739
Category
cs.CV

Abstract

arXiv:2608.29739

Jiaqi Liu, Zixuan Wang, Yuhong Zhang, Dingkang Liang, Jane Hanqi Li, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Gert Cauwenberghs

Geometric eye trackers can provide the spatial accuracy required for gaze-based interaction and multimodal studies, but their measurements remain sensitive to residual session-specific calibration error. Research on correcting this error is difficult to compare because methods are typically evaluated with different devices, target layouts, and error definitions. We present a calibration-focused dataset containing 163 trials from 12 participants, with separate 18-point fitting and 32-point test grids, and use it to evaluate global, local, and composite correction functions under a common spatial-extrapolation protocol. We further introduce a lightweight neural refiner that combines ranked predictions from complementary calibrators. On this controlled dataset, post-vendor correction reduces the mean angular error from $1.53^\circ$ to $1.03^\circ$ with the strongest classical composite and to $0.96^\circ$ with the refiner. In a closed-loop gaze task, lower residual error is associated with higher performance across four online correction conditions. These results provide a reproducible data-quality benchmark for using gaze as a behavioral signal in interactive modeling.